Traffic Fatalities Down; Motorized Traffic Still Violent and Deadly

Picture 21
The Times reported on Saturday that traffic fatalities are down so far this year. That’s “only” 16,626 killed in the first half of 2009, where as at this time in 2008, more than 20,000 folks’ lives ended in traffic. You can find the full report from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration here. When you read it, you’ll find that 142,204 people have died in traffic accidents since 2005. That’s not bad, considering the risk and the billions of miles traveled. But its still horrifying number. 1 is horrifying enough.

There are interesting reasons why we have “good news” of a slight drop in fatalities:

“Government officials and private experts cite a variety of factors. Highways are built or renovated with more consideration for safety. Seat belt use rose over the period, although some experts are skeptical about the accuracy of official counts. As old vehicles are retired, the ones that replace them have more air bags, antilock brakes and stability control systems, which sense when a car is in a skid and apply a brake to one wheel to help the driver regain control. In addition, new restrictions are in place for licenses for teenagers.”

“The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, a nonprofit trade group that performs crash tests, calculated that if car designs had been frozen in 1985, with no further safety improvements, death rates by 2004 would have been about 15 percent higher than was actually the case.”

What does this mean for cycling? The NHTSA reports that since 1932, about 52,000 “pedalcyclists” have lost their lives in traffic accidents. But while advances in motorized travel safety have limited the number of fatalities in motor vehicles in recent years, the bicycle remains the same basic vehicle it was in 1932. While there are debates about the utility of styrofoam helmets, it would be difficult to argue that their increased use in the United States hasn’t saved some lives (especially in the kind of alcohol-related accidents that cause a majority of traffic fatalities). I don’t believe they convey instant safety, and there are times I feel safer with one, sometimes without. Nevertheless, one sits astride a bicycle the same way they did when FDR was first elected – graceful, but vulnerable. Riding authoritatively, legally, and defensively can go a long way. But there are never guarantees.

The biggest concern for cyclists and pedestrians coming out of this data have to do with mobile communication. Reports indicate that 342,00 accidents are caused by cell phone use, while studies show that texting or talking on cell phones (hands free or not) simulate the driving of someone with a .08% blood/alcohol level. I don’t see why mobile communication use shouldn’t be absolutely banned while driving. This would make me more confident riding, especially at night when visibility is impaired. While we’re at it, lets ban driving in some areas, and make it harder to drive fast and more clear about the presence and rights of cyclists with green bike lanes and the like.

These numbers are unacceptable. Terrorist threats, with likely fatalities far smaller than the bloody numbers presented at the NHTSA, completely changed the way we fly. Why can’t the consistency of these statistics motivate change in terms of how we get around?

Slow-volution

3993413589_f30983b588_b
The goin’s slow with my Kogswell kid-hauler, grocery-getter, and lock-up bike. RIght now it works for how I use it, but I’d like to do more carrying up front with a rack that includes pannier placement.

Kid hauling always calls for special consideration around brakes and cargo – it needs to be safer than I usually accept for myself. My “curatorial” work on this bike mirrors the sloth of my dissertation writing. However, it moves sluggardly toward “finalization.”

I ride my soon-to-be 4 year old daughter all over the place on the Bobike Mini, but she’s nearly grown out of it. I might go with a Bobike Junior on the rear of this bike. I’d build a longtail if I had more storage space.

Bike Blogs; Payola; Ads

picture-5
A few years ago, The Onion reported:

“From the tens of millions of consumer reviews posted on retail giants like Amazon.com to the more specialized message boards of Motorcycle.com and Macaddict.com, Piersall estimated that 80 percent of all human discourse now takes the form of product reviews on the web.”

I’ve always loved that story. It reminded me of when I taught video production in graduate school, the students would always put fake advertisements into their programs, even though they were not required to. Ads and consumption make up a common sense in our culture so that we not only assume their normalcy in daily life – but we also take their dominance of our visual and acoustic experience for granted.

Blogging, since it was invented by Al Gore, has always drawn the interest of marketers and advertisers, who would rather appeal to us through a vernacular voice – since we’re to savvy to be duped by advertising and marketing that directly equates the material value of a product or service with some unrelated, far-fetched symbolic value. Anyway, a watershed moment in the bicycling world came when bikesnob reviewed a Look carbon fibré rig on April Fool’s Day. His site includes some of the smartest writing on the web, and I sincerely enjoy it. But his hilarious review (and subsequent hilarious reviews) raises questions about the nature of bike blogs and relationships with advertisers and free stuff or “loaners” from eager manufacturers. Now, Washington steps in.

This week, the FTC passed controversial regulations requiring bloggers to disclose payment from a manufacturer for products they review. The New York Times summary can be found here.

I won’t be afraid to give a shout out to bike stuff that I find particularly wonderful, but I don’t think that’s what blogs are for (or what this one is for). What does the FTC’s action mean for bike blogs? What should it mean?

Into the Wild

3976482854_b3f9901dd0_b

I’ve been doing a bit of Mt. Laguna singletrack on Friday evenings with a colleague and his friends. Some conflicting feelings about trail riding have kept me from the mountains for a while. As transportation cyclist, I have issues with driving a car and burning fuel to, then, ride a bicycle. But some phenomenal recent rides in our backcountry and in Los Angeles, Redlands, and Orange County have shaken me from my do-gooder green funk. There are trails I ride to regularly from Central San Diego: Los Peñasquitos Preserve, San Clemente Canyon, Tecolote Canyon, and Rose Canyon. The road-wear on my rear knobby tire testifies to this. But I’m now all for driving out to a ride – carpooling preferably – if it means getting out into nature.

San Diego County contains the most biodiversity of any county in the lower 48 – and our mountains – a mere hour from downtown – are full of pine, cedar, oak, and many critters. One such critter is the mountain lion. There are also rattlesnakes. And cows.

I got a late start to meet my group at 5pm, but I figured some spirited driving would get me there within minutes of the start. Then it rained while I passed on Interstate 8 through Mission Valley, and traffic seized up. I arrived 15 minutes late, and the group had already left. The group spoke about the diminishing daylight this time of year after our last ride, and I hoped they’d begin without me, as I didn’t want my tardiness to delay the ride. Indeed, upon arrival, I discovered they had already begun. I was relieved.

Without much thought, I got my Rawland off the rack and started a long downhill before turning into the forest for technical singletrack. The Rawland is not a mountain bike, per se. It as a rigid all-rounder fitted with 650B (27.5) Pacenti Neo-Moto 58mm knobbies run at about 35psi. I love this bike on trails, as the larger wheels roll over most things and the old-school approach makes finding a line more important than bombing over everything, which dual suspension facilitates.

Once I entered the forest and the technical stuff, I had a thought. “Aren’t there mountain lions around here?” Then I had a couple more thoughts: “Don’t they hunt at dusk?” and “Aren’t trail users advised not to ride or hike alone?” Its kind of like spear fishing or snorkeling. Once a white shark enters one’s thoughts, it cannot be expelled.

I began singing and then talking very loudly, so as not to surprise a wandering lion. I talked about my work: “I need to finish this PROJECT!” Then I talked about the ride: “I’m coming around the CORNER!” When I saw the moonrise, I began making up words to the Creedeence song “I Hear a Bad Moon Rising.” It was a lovely moonrise:
3975722397_1ec0c20359_b

My paranoid ride was nearly complete, after circumnavigating Big Laguna cattle lake and skirting Nobel Canyon. Heading back up to the parking lot, I came upon a few large cattle standing on the singletrack. The rutted trail had already suggested heavy cattle presence. One of these cattle was particularly heavy – a bull. That word seems a bit cartoon-ish. But is there another word for a large cow with a penis and sharp horns? The other cattle trotted off after I made cowboy noises like like the bad guys did in Shane. But this bull just focused on me, and then began huffing and shifting his weight around, kicking up dust with his legs. I stared at him. He was locked in on me. I stood between him and a barbed wire fence. I saddled up, and slowly pedaled by. He never took his eyes off me. I somehow made it past the beast, and then rode like hell up to the safety of my oft-ambling Volvo wagon.

When off pavement, I prefer fire roads and hard-pack trails with an all-rounder fat-tire roadish bicycle, as such riding provides many opportunities to enjoy the view. Sometimes, singletrack focuses my vision too much on the ground, and not enough on the wonderful wilderness I’m passing through. But one of the great things about riding singletrack in the wilderness is that it delivers you right into the wild, and all the primordial fears come with it (fears of a city kid, admittedly).

Compelling Analysis of the Demise of Japanese Lugged Steel Bicycles

Picture 15
Grant Peterson at Rivendell is a very smart person. In his most recent post on their site, he makes a lucid analysis of why fans of lugged, steel bikes find themselves in a cycling industry ghetto:

“Every now and then I talk about the dollar and Yen. I think about it all the time, because we buy so much expensive Japanese stuff, and how many yen one dollar buys has a tremendous effect on what we pay. Short historical perspective. In 1972 a dollar bought 375 yen. In 1984 it bought 250 yen.

In May 1985, five country’s moneymen got together and came up with a plan to help the balance of trade among their countries (US, Japan, Germany, Italy, and England, as I recall). The way to do that is to re-value their currencies; and so it was de—are any of you still reading this?–cided that a dollar should buy only 150 yen–that would make it easier for Japanese companies to import American-made goods, and that would help balance the trade between Japan and the U.S.–
But the change from 250 in April of 1985 to 150 in May made it way more costly for American companies to import Japanese goods, because it meant almost a doubling of prices for anything Japanese. Doubling retail prices was unacceptable, so the strategy was to cheapen the Japanese stuff, to lower the cost, to keep the retail prices the same. So if you bought a Japanese-made XYX before the re-valuation, it might cost $100, and would be made with hi-grade materials and intensive labor to make it shine. If you bought XYZ after the re-valuation, it would cost about the same $100, but would be made with worse materials and less labor.

To avoid an apples-to-apples comparison, something had to change, so you wouldn’t say, “Hey, wazzup with this? Last year it looked fancy and polished, and now it’s plain and painted and it costs the same.” Lugged bikes almost entirely died in the popular price ranges, and the thrust from finery to technology, and we got indexing. Over the next decade, non-indexed (friction) shifting lugged steel bicycles became associated with classic nostalgia and connoisseurs and tweed and meerschaum pipes and waxed cotton and all That Stuff, which really isn’t fair to any of it, especially the bikes.”

This is a very good example of the relationships between quality of production, and marketing. I’ll leave the issue of global trade behind for now, but when the Japanese government attempted to boost the yen to play more deftly in the global economy, it had important ramifications for manufacturers and cyclists. As Grant writes, in order to keep up, Japanese bicycle manufacturers had to lower their costs by lowering their quality… which lead to the demise of high-quality japanese lugged steel frames, which were far too expensive to sustain the supply/demand/price equilibrium of the bike boom.

If materials and production quality falls, then manufacturers rely on marketing to bridge the gap between product and price. This is about the same time, I would argue, that marketing began to overwhelm product quality in customer appeals to drive sales in the bicycle industry. What worked well would no longer do. There needed to be non-material reasons to buy bicycles — and we saw a parade of new technologies that provided arguments for upgrades and continued spending. It might also be argued that these are reasons why touring and utility cycling took a back seat to racing in the United States. Annually, racing seasons exhibit the newest elite technology, which is ripe for advertising campaigns. Some of the best touring and utility technology has been around for decades. As Grant mentions, those who valued tried-and-true bicycle technology and aesthetics were herded into the retrogrouch corral.

With the emergent custom scene and the fetishization of vintage bikes (by cyclotouristes and fixed gear riders alike), I wonder if things are changing…

If You’re Gonna Go Big…

…You might as well go really big:
3872362944_58161e1f4c_b

What a great inspiration build from Banjo Cycles. This “Big Dumb Pug” mixes the concepts behind Surly’s Big Dummy longtail and a fat-tire, Endomorph-clad Pugsley. I love the idea of fat tire bicycles, but most of what I imagine rolls on some Schwalbe Big Apples or Fat Franks. But this looks like so much fun.

I would imaging that riding around town on such a vehicle would elicit a permanent smile and lots of comment. You could go anywhere, and enjoy the view while bumping around with your load. This longtail is not merely a car-replacement, but an armageddon bike.

Driving Us Mad

Picture 1

I recently drove a morning commute for the first time since 1996. Since then, I’ve been lucky enough to walk, take the bus, train, or cycle to work or school. Currently, my daughters’ nursery school is about 20 minutes away (the cause of great enmity between my wife and I – now mostly resolved), and it was my turn to drive her there. I came home frustrated and angry – and in disbelief that we’ve decided to set up our urban life in such a de-humanizing way.

While preparing to get into our old Volvo and head out, I fantasized about the commute. I would be driving on a cool September morning, hot coffee in hand, with NPR on the radio and my daughter happily looking out the window. I’d be part of the excitement and hubbub of the day – part of the morning rush. We got in the car, buckled in, and headed out.

Initially, my fantasies played out. I enjoyed the meandering drive from my house to the freeway. There was dew on the car, and or neighborhood seemed fresh. Then, we got on the freeway, and I remembered that commute times do not facilitate courteous driving. As we slung on the freeway, cars rushed at us and wouldn’t let us merge to the left. We were almost directed onto another freeway. I got the bird when I finally forced the issue, using the indicator and relying on the old 240 wagon to push its way over in its trademark dorky, no-nonsense manner. Throughout the drive, motorists tailgated, slammed on their brakes, honked, and exceeded the speed limit. There was a sense of danger and dissatisfaction that permeated the experience. People had looks on their faces that reminded me of what one might see among slot players at a third-rate casino – sheer boredom mixed with hopelessness and misery.

We got to school, and I saw my daughter off. Then I headed back home to get on my bicycle for the short ride to work (I don’t have a parking permit). As I drove home, I couldn’t shake the feeling that we are all slaves. Now, we are not slaves, but there is a submission that seems especially acute during drive times – a submission to a system of production and consumption that sustains itself and forms an infinite loop. We herd ourselves to work, consuming fuel, driving cars that cost tens of thousands of dollars, over an automobile-based infrastructure costing tens of millions of dollars, so that we might go to work, make more money, pay taxes that support the infrastructure that makes the commute possible, and earn money so that we might buy more things, like cars and petrol.

I’m being a bit unfair. Our economic system relies on a certain level of conspicuous consumption. But my car commute brought the system into sharp focus. Perhaps, as I do the commute more often, these issues will melt into the background. But I do know that even though I’m riding to work on my bicycle so that I can sit at my desk and do my work, there is an inherent sense of independence, efficiency, sustainability, and freedom that I etch out into my day on the bicycle that I can’t get in a car. Walking is almost as nice. I only wish that more people – perhaps some of the hundreds that I encountered on my motor-commute, might give themselves the chance to feel it.

Steel is Real, Again

As has been noted around the bicycle internets, many of the big, mass-production bicycle makers will offer steel bikes as part of their line ups, and come spring, local bike shops should be full of new “old fashioned” bicycles from the big names. Here are a few:

Electra Ticino:
w750h500

Fuji Connoisseur:
Picture 6

Specialized Allez Steel:
9000-89_d

Trek Belleville:
3817616540_31d61fb46e

These are all mass-market, major names in cycling, and they seem to be paying attention to what’s going on not only on the custom framebuilding scene, but also to utility cyclists who create very practical randonneuring and city bikes from Soma, Surly, Kogswell, and Rawland on the low-price end. Move up the price and quality chain, and I’m sure plenty of inspiration has been gathered from many of the bikes built up by Rivendell, Jitensha, and Waterford and the many excellent reviews in Bicycle Quarterly.

I have read in some places that these new steel bikes are “ripping off” ideas from the insurgent retrogrouch movement (Velo Orange), but most of the good ideas from niche bicycle designers or retailers just borrow from tried-and-true ideas. When people know what they are doing (Grant Peterson, for example), the combination of design knowledge and a reliance on time-tested bicycle ideas can create cycling nirvana.

I hope that these new steel frames create a larger tent for those seeking a more interesting riding experience, although none of them interest me that much (I love the Soma Buena Vista). Maybe that will happen. Maybe when one of these bikes comes in 650B!

Electra Ticino Forthcoming

A lot of people could benefit from coming across a stylish utilitarian bicycle, in the ilk of the British 3-speed or French porteur bike, while shopping for a transportation among the Trek hybrids and Specialized Langster singlespeeds at their local bike shop. A lot of folks coming back to riding are just trying to get on a bike, and maybe a Dutch city bike, with its considerable heft and long wheelbase, may not be the best option (despite what the NYT Style section says). I think vintage is probably the best route for something practical at a relatively low price. Most 80s steel frames – especially the touring Treks, Miyatas, and Bridgestones – and old 3-speeds are as stylish and practical as they come (if you live in a flat-ish area). But some people don’t buy anything “used.” Kogswell, Surly, and Soma offer good utilitarian frames, but you have to know how to build them up.

Anyway, all of the above options are wonderful. But some folks just want something new, and often these are the same people who shop by price. So, they’re not going to support a custom frame builder — just yet.

I’ve always thought the Bianchi Milano was pretty smart. But here, Electra, a San Diego company, is coming out with the Ticino later this year. Inside word is that they will be at Interbike in September, and will be offered at different prices based on the builds (from basic single speed to kitted out randonneur models). They will come in traditional and step-through. Pretty cool, if it serves as a feeder to custom builders.
image001

More information can be found here.

Taking a Different Path

I’ve been following Russ & Laura’s project, and its worth visiting their site, pathlesspedaled.com:

“In March 2009, Laura Crawford and Russ Roca made the decision to drop out of the status quo and find others around the world who have done the same. Paring down their lives to just what will fit on two bicycles, Laura and Russ are embarking on an extended bike tour throughout the US and beyond…”

The simple pleasures of riding a bicycle can translate well to the rest of one’s life. Riding often begs the question of stuff in general – simplicity, beauty, utilitarianism, and reliability help one enjoy the scenery. Perhaps these same qualities can enhance life and are good guides in choosing the material things that we surround ourselves with.

I’ve done my little part in helping Russ sell his stuff, by buying these Ostrich panniers from him (so much for getting rid of things!):
DSC_0010

I’ve only used them for book hauling, but so far I like ’em. Sure, they look good, but they are a bit limited in capacity, especially when compared to Ortlieb packers. Perhaps more on the bags later as I get more experience with them.